Would it be morally wrong to set George Bush on fire at this point?

How do politicians justify barring potentially life-saving research, instead choosing to let the embryos be THROWN IN THE TRASH? They do realize that less than a third of the country actually opposes stem-cell research, and a lot of that is probably due to the inexplicable spew suggesting stem-cell research is tantamount to abortion. Don't they get that the embryos are being destroyed anyway? Better that their demise brings new hope for cures to debilitating diseases.

My grandmother has Alzheimers. Excuse me if I don't want anyone to have to experience the pain she and her family are going through.

First veto in 5 1/2 years. I can't think of a word filthy enough to describe how I feel about Bush right now.